Case Studies

14 dependent claims filed

Context, constraints, alternatives, decision, trade-offs. Never just the output.

claim 1.4DynamoxGreenfield2 min
Founding an analytics service by moving reporting off the transactional database
Founded a new reporting service that separates heavy analytical reads from the transactional database, resolving indicator timeouts, framing the OLTP-vs-OLAP trade-off, critically reviewing the architecture decision, and building the walking skeleton and its data layer.
claim 1.9DynamoxIncident2 min
Responding to a production incident with the missing architecture decision, not just a patch
Root-caused a customer-blocking production incident to an undocumented architecture assumption, rebuilt the affected consumer with a post-mortem, an ADR, and business-rules documentation, then, after rollout exposed a database deadlock, diagnosed it to a Kafka partitioning mismatch and replaced silent message loss with retry, a dead-letter queue, and per-user serialization.
claim 1.12DynamoxPerformance & Data Platform8 min
Trading a runtime join for a materialized column, then finding the 79% my own migration left behind
A per-request warehouse join was scanning 658.8 MB against a hard 953.7 MiB per-job ceiling, on a table growing with every new customer. I measured it, moved the join into the pipeline that already ran it, deleted the cache that was hiding the problem, then audited my own migration and found 79% of production rows never backfilled, plus 9,299 alerts that had never appeared in the product at all.
claim 1.5DynamoxIncident2 min
Correcting production data safely with reversible, auditable tooling
Corrected tens of thousands of corrupted production records (~33k in one case) with no maintenance window, using reusable CLI commands with dry-run, rollback files, batch auditing and event re-publishing, a "correction command" pattern the team then reused.
claim 1.6DynamoxPerformance2 min
Delivering a large asset tree end to end, from recursive SQL to progressive prefetch
Delivered search and fast navigation over very large asset trees end to end, with recursive SQL on the backend and a search UX with in-memory caching and progressive background prefetch on the frontend, eliminating the repeated loading that made the most-used flow slow.
claim 1.11DynamoxArchitecture2 min
Designing the safety guarantees for an AI-orchestrated cleanup, not just automating the grind
Designed and built a Claude Code skill that safely orchestrates parallel agents to remove expired feature flags across a shared frontend and two backend services, closing a 36-subtask cleanup epic (24 feature flags plus 3 expired product tours and a legacy page, ~3,100 lines removed in one commit), with disjoint-file-set batching so agents can't collide, diff-against-baseline validation instead of absolute pass/fail, and an enforced two-repository deploy order so infrastructure changes can never precede the code that depends on them.
claim 1.3DynamoxDebugging2 min
Making a flaky end-to-end suite deterministic without hiding failures
Turned a non-deterministic end-to-end suite (25 to 37 failures varying per run) into 302 passing with zero failures (8 pre-existing skips left untouched, and the consumer running), without adding a skip or weakening an assertion, and, in review, empirically proved that three of four proposed production changes were unnecessary.
claim 1.8DynamoxSecurity2 min
Making container and dependency hardening a standing practice, not an audit response
Turned container and dependency hardening into a standing quarterly practice across two backend services over four quarters, covering non-root runtimes, 135 CVEs flagged and all 7 rated critical remediated in the first pass, then a base-image and dependency overhaul that took the audit from 69 findings to 16, unfixable OS CVEs from 160 to 0, and the final image from 1.64 GB to 463 MB, with exploitability-based accepted risk documented rather than version numbers chased, and one self-inflicted rollout regression root-caused and fixed the same day.
claim 1.2DynamoxDistributed Systems2 min
Synchronizing a Cross-Service Data Edit Atomically
Made an edit to an organizational node in the asset hierarchy propagate consistently across denormalized copies in seven tables and two services, via a single atomic transaction with post-commit events, the work that made me the team's reference for cross-service synchronization.
claim 1.13DynamoxArchitecture & Product Scoping7 min
Changing where a new state is handled, instead of teaching eight read paths about it
A new platform-wide asset state was specified as a rule that eight different read paths had to learn. I proposed applying it once at the write boundary instead, removing the asset from route scope and restoring it on reactivation, which made most of the original scope unnecessary and left the counters, reports, app sync and adherence untouched.
claim 1.7DynamoxLeadership2 min
Bringing error observability to a team that had none
Gave a team that had no error monitoring a structured observability practice built from a shared reporter and request-time-tagged API interceptor plus dashboards and a triage workflow, turning production bugs from something reported by support into something the team can see and prioritize.
claim 1.10DynamoxCollaboration2 min
Choosing the right altitude to fix a bug found in review, not just the fastest patch
In code review, caught a null-safety bug that would have crashed three production components, and fixed the defect class rather than the three instances, by proposing a shared data-layer helper to the PR's author instead of patching each render site myself; one of 310 pull requests I gave an explicit review verdict on that half (702 across four repositories between 2025-03 and 2026-08), measured from the Bitbucket API rather than recalled.